Summary response #2
Street Children
In this article “The Killings Escalate In Brazil,” Caius Brandao mentions that Brazil has a high a quality of children’s rights legislation, but why are many Brazilian children still dying? In addition, she mentions that killing children is a business in Brazil. The powerful elite pay killers to kill children for private security. The killers do not get guilt or punishment. This author also mentions why this business is profitable. Killing children is to help the killer’s life and to decrease street crimes. However this author suggests that these killings are escalating. Finally this author mentions how many children are killed a year. In my opinion, Governments should control number of street children to change the law to accept abortion.
First, Brazil should make laws without considering religion. Their religion does not accept abortions but accepting killing children is strange. Their religion helps prenatal children but it dose not help born children. The parents of street children are too irresponsible, so they already have discarded their religion.
Second, street children are trying to survive themselves; government should support them. Brazil has too much population to protect them, so if they do not have enough money to protect street children people should not make children. Government should make a choice for people. That is better than killing children in live moral life.
Finally, governments should make sex education programs to teach that contraception is important. If they cannot bring up children they should use contraception. However, sometimes despite people use of contraception, it does not work and sometimes they make children accidentally. Therefore, people need abortion.
In conclusion, Brazil should accept abortion because their religion does not help children, governments could not support street children and contraception sometimes does not work. If Brazil accepts abortion, they can decrease the number of street children.
Finally, governments should make sex education programs to teach that contraception is important. If they cannot bring up children they should use contraception. However, sometimes despite people use of contraception, it does not work and sometimes they make children accidentally. Therefore, people need abortion.
In conclusion, Brazil should accept abortion because their religion does not help children, governments could not support street children and contraception sometimes does not work. If Brazil accepts abortion, they can decrease the number of street children.
Reference
Brandao, C. (1995, April 24). The Killings Escalate In Brazil. ICRI Brazil Project
Coordinator. Retrieved July 16, 2007, from
http://www.pangaea.org/street_children/latin/brazil.htm
by Hiroyuki Asano
Street Children
In this article “The Killings Escalate In Brazil,” Caius Brandao mentions that Brazil has a high a quality of children’s rights legislation, but why are many Brazilian children still dying? In addition, she mentions that killing children is a business in Brazil. The powerful elite pay killers to kill children for private security. The killers do not get guilt or punishment. This author also mentions why this business is profitable. Killing children is to help the killer’s life and to decrease street crimes. However this author suggests that these killings are escalating. Finally this author mentions how many children are killed a year. In my opinion, Governments should control number of street children to change the law to accept abortion.
First, Brazil should make laws without considering religion. Their religion does not accept abortions but accepting killing children is strange. Their religion helps prenatal children but it dose not help born children. The parents of street children are too irresponsible, so they already have discarded their religion.
Second, street children are trying to survive themselves; government should support them. Brazil has too much population to protect them, so if they do not have enough money to protect street children people should not make children. Government should make a choice for people. That is better than killing children in live moral life.
Finally, governments should make sex education programs to teach that contraception is important. If they cannot bring up children they should use contraception. However, sometimes despite people use of contraception, it does not work and sometimes they make children accidentally. Therefore, people need abortion.
In conclusion, Brazil should accept abortion because their religion does not help children, governments could not support street children and contraception sometimes does not work. If Brazil accepts abortion, they can decrease the number of street children.
Finally, governments should make sex education programs to teach that contraception is important. If they cannot bring up children they should use contraception. However, sometimes despite people use of contraception, it does not work and sometimes they make children accidentally. Therefore, people need abortion.
In conclusion, Brazil should accept abortion because their religion does not help children, governments could not support street children and contraception sometimes does not work. If Brazil accepts abortion, they can decrease the number of street children.
Reference
Brandao, C. (1995, April 24). The Killings Escalate In Brazil. ICRI Brazil Project
Coordinator. Retrieved July 16, 2007, from
http://www.pangaea.org/street_children/latin/brazil.htm
by Hiroyuki Asano
posted by hero at
10:14 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home